Thursday, May 20, 2021

Electoral college pros and cons essay

Electoral college pros and cons essay

electoral college pros and cons essay

2/10/ · Advantages of the Electoral College Promotes fair regional representation: The Electoral College gives the small states an equal voice. If the president was elected by the popular vote alone, candidates would mold their platforms to cater to the more populous blogger.comted Reading Time: 7 mins 30/10/ · The electoral college gives small states more weight in the political process than their population would otherwise confer. Pro #2: It provides a clean, widely accepted ending to the election (most of the time). The electoral college, proponents say, makes U.S. presidential elections less contentious by providing a clear blogger.com: Amelia Josephson 23/5/ · The electoral college may have a few pros and cons. First one pro is that no matter what year it is, the number to win is always so not a lot of people can forget that when watching the elections. Second pro would be that since the census changes, so do the numbers of electors per state (Electoral Vote vs Popular Vote)/5(24)



The Pros and Cons of the Electoral College - SmartAsset



As the U. This process stopped the process that was used in England to select a Prime Minister, electoral college pros and cons essay. There are currently electors up for grabs in an election, electoral college pros and cons essay, which means a majority of is necessary to elect the President. Although there are some advantages to this system, the disadvantages have been highlighted in recent elections.


There are also circumstances where a majority of electors might not be available, electoral college pros and cons essay, which would throw the results of the election into the House of Representatives. As Americans look at their election processes, a complete review of the electoral college pros and cons essay and cons of abolishing the Electoral College is useful when taking this unique structure into account. It causes some votes to have greater weight than others.


Because the Electoral College is based on the structure of state populations and representation in the House, some people have a vote that carries more weight per delegate than others. That means if you electoral college pros and cons essay in a rural area, your vote may count more toward who gets to be the eventual president. If this system were to be abolished, then every vote counted would have the exact same weight in the final tally.


This action would allow the popular vote winner to take the White House. Over 2. Two of those elections have occurred since Only one election was so close that it had to go to the House of Representatives, which is how John Quincy Adams won over Andrew Jackson. Instead of dealing with these complications, a simple majority vote would always speak of the will of the people, electoral college pros and cons essay.


We already see gridlock and partisanship in Congress that limits the opportunities for collaboration. Switching to this standard system would not likely create an adverse result. It would stop the requirement to redistribute the electoral votes. The U. Census creates the allocations of electoral votes that each state receives. That means the information receives an update every 10 years. The census is therefore valid for the, and Presidential elections. Then the census will be valid for the and elections.


Abolishing the Electoral College would get rid of this confusing process. There can be distinctive advantages to one party in a decade where three election cycles are possible, electoral college pros and cons essay. It also stops the distribution process where California gets 55 votes, but a state like Delaware only gets electoral college pros and cons essay. Every vote would electoral college pros and cons essay equally instead.


The reasons for the Electoral College may not be relevant any more. When the Founding Fathers built the idea of the Electoral College into the structure of the American government, their idea of information management was very different than what we have today. Candidates had to go to each state to talk about what they wanted to do for the country because there was no other way to let people know what was happening.


Thanks to the Internet, telephones, email, social media, and every other form of communication that we have today, people can choose for themselves whether a new story has an underlying sinister bias. Abolishing the Electoral College seems to be the next logical step electoral college pros and cons essay that process.


It no longer serves the intended job. Alexander Hamilton was a significant supporter of the Electoral College. Although he said that the system was far from perfect, it was at least excellent. Hamilton believed that it would prevent the Office of the President from falling into the lot of a person who was not endowed with the requisite qualifications to serve the American people. Critics of the system would argue that the elections of Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump are evidence that this impact is no longer present in U.


There will always be a concern about the tyranny of the majority in the United States. This issue exists in the Electoral College when the rural states face off with the urban ones. The only difference is that in this unique structure, the voice of the minority can actually shout down the desires of the majority. Abolishing the Electoral College stops swing states from having sway in the election.


Even though proponents of the Electoral College want it to stay so that every state can have a specific say in the outcome of the election, the candidates are already starting to behave in the same ways that people electoral college pros and cons essay they would when targeting a majority population groups. It also prevents candidates from going into states where the electorate typically votes for the other party.


When you know that one state will vote the same way in every election, there is no electoral college pros and cons essay to visit that place. Reagan would almost make a clean sweep in as well, taking of electoral votes and only losing Minnesota and DC.


The electoral college ignores the will of the people. There are over million people currently residing in the United States, but only people actually get to choose who gets to be the president.


Even when it is against the law for these folks to vote for someone other than what the electoral results in their state indicate, there is always an option to become a faithless elector under the American structure. The presidential election in saw a modern-era record for faithless electors, but five of them came from the Clinton camp.


Only two Republicans voted for someone other than Trump and Pence. Four of the electors came from the state of Washington. Colin Powell was the primary beneficiary, receiving three votes. Bernie Sanders, John Kasich, Ron Paul, and Faith Spotted Eagle received one each. There were two additional votes for Sanders that were invalidated in Minnesota and one for Kasich in Colorado.


The interests of the minority would no longer receive protection. The primary benefit of the electoral college is that it works to protect the best interests of the minority in every election. Electors manage the needs of the state and community instead of following the will of the general public throughout the country. That means there must be a majority of states that agree with a specific candidate instead of allowing the people to decide who they want to have as president, electoral college pros and cons essay.


The electors can vote their conscience as well, refusing to follow what their state elections guide them to do. This process means that each candidate must speak with the entire country instead of visiting the largest cities as a way to solicit for votes.


This design promotes the two-party system. It is a process that allows the people to choose who serves in the White House instead of throwing it into Congress. That means centrist ideas tend to be the ones that receive the most traction instead of the individual priorities of platforms on the extreme left or right. That means more people can feel like their government accurately represents their needs.


Having this structure go away would encourage more third-party development. That means the major party that can maintain its base could win elections without a clear majority. It would create problems when multiple candidates run. George W. Bush won the Electoral College in even though he received 0.


Then inDonald Trump won the Electoral College despite receiving 2. The chances of a recount would increase dramatically with election. The general threshold that an election result must reach to trigger an automatic recount is a difference of 0, electoral college pros and cons essay. In the history of the United States, electoral college pros and cons essay have been six presidential elections that would have qualified for this issue — and three of them have occurred since The cost of conducting a nationwide recount could be hundreds of millions of dollars, which is money that may not always be in the budget.


Sticking to the electoral college format allows us to use electors as intended instead of relying on all of the votes counting. It creates 50 individual contests. Under the current structure of the United States, there are 50 unique presidential contests instead of one nationwide affair to elect a President. If the U. were to abolish the electoral college, then the restrictions that territories experience against voting in this election would disappear. Residents of places like Puerto Rico and Guam would have their votes be counted in the final total, and these locations consistently vote for one party.


This shift would likely benefit that party for more than a generation. Keeping the electoral college restricts the voting to acknowledged states only. All parts of the country would not be involved in the selection of the president. Without the Electoral College in place, presidential candidates would build platforms that would speak to their base. Instead of having a regional focus that incorporates specific campaigning elements, there would be a national campaign instead.


Iowa farmers might lose out to California union workers since their population numbers are larger. The small towns in the United States, along with all of the rural areas, electoral college pros and cons essay, would become marginalized if this system were to be entirely abolished. Getting rid of the Electoral College would radicalize politics.


The political game in the United States would change dramatically without the Electoral College present. Instead of a politician trying to appeal to someone with specific needs, the adoption of a general platform that maximizes votes in urban centers would become the emphasis of each party.


The places where there are more people become the top priority, especially if there is a chance to swing some votes. The current structure limits Americans from pushing in this direction even though candidates tend to visit swing states more often. Eliminating this barrier could mean that some parts of the country never become part of the overall campaign. When Americans are polled about the Electoral College, most of them say that they want it to disappear.


They want the option to select a president based on who gets the most votes nationally. During the election cycle, there are several candidates who are promising to work on doing just that. One of the ways that states are considering a way to go around the Electoral College is called the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. This agreement includes several states and DC, giving the electoral vote count assigned to them to the candidate who receives the most votes in the national election, electoral college pros and cons essay.


It would only come into effect when it could guarantee that outcome.




Does your vote count? The Electoral College explained - Christina Greer

, time: 5:22





Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College - Free Essay Example | blogger.com


electoral college pros and cons essay

12/6/ · However, both the popular vote and the electoral college have pros and cons. The pros for the electoral college is that is has been used for years. The basis of the electoral college is written down in the constitution. As long as the United States uses the electoral college as the way to vote in a president there will be no need for a constitutional amendment 12/11/ · One of the Pros is that the National Popular Vote wins the Electoral College majority, which proves the peoples voice and cote is heard and is being represented by the Electoral College. Another pro is that the Electoral College has been there are a small number of votes that needs to be counted Prox the founding of Essay United States, the creation of the Electoral College was a compromised that was reached Cons direct the election of a President. Pros allows individuals to vote for And candidates they wish and College to have electorates cast ballots based on the voting Electoral of their region

No comments:

Post a Comment