Mar 18, · Animals themselves benefit from the results of animal testing. Vaccines tested on animals have saved millions of animals that would otherwise have died from rabies, distemper, feline leukemia, infectious hepatitis virus, tetanus, anthrax, and canine parvo blogger.comted Reading Time: 8 mins Should Animal Testing Be Banned Essay. Many animals are hurt and abused during animal testing. The animals that are tested on usually die off. Cosmetic, medical, chemical, product testing and etc. I believe all testing needs that use animals for testing needs to be banned throughout companies Aug 19, · Animal Testing Pros and Cons Introduction. The Greeks believed that animals were a lesser form of life because animals could not think like Animal testing helps in the development of drugs and treatments.. Currently, humans are often exposed to various The importance of human lives
Pros and Cons of Animal Testing - Free Essay Example | blogger.com
An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, animal testing pros and cons essay, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedicalcommercial, and health care uses.
Research on living animals has been practiced since at least BC. Proponents of animal testing say that it has enabled the development of many life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, that there is no alternative method for researching a complete living organism, and that strict regulations prevent the mistreatment of animals in laboratories.
Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, that alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results.
Read more background…, animal testing pros and cons essay. The California Biomedical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last years has resulted directly from research using animals. A living systems, human beings and animals animal testing pros and cons essay extremely complex.
Studying cell cultures in a petri dish, while sometimes useful, does not provide the opportunity to study animal testing pros and cons essay processes occurring in the central nervous system, endocrine system, and immune system.
Conditions such as blindness and high blood pressure cannot be studied in tissue cultures. that function in essentially the same way with the help of a bloodstream and central nervous system. When testing medicines for potential toxicity, the lives of human volunteers should not be put in danger unnecessarily.
It would be unethical to perform invasive experimental procedures on human beings before the methods have been tested on animals, and some experiments involve genetic manipulation that would be unacceptable to impose on human subjects before animal testing. Vaccines tested on animals have saved millions of animals that would otherwise have died from rabies, distemper, feline leukemia, infectious animal testing pros and cons essay virus, tetanus, animal testing pros and cons essay, anthrax, and canine parvo virus.
Treatments for animals developed using animal testing also include pacemakers for heart disease and remedies for glaucoma and hip dysplasia. Animal testing has been instrumental in saving endangered species from extinction, including the black-footed ferret, the California condor and the tamarins of Brazil.
In addition to local and state laws and guidelines, animal research has been regulated by the federal Animal Welfare Act AWA since As well as stipulating minimum housing standards for research animals enclosure size, temperature, access to clean food and water, and othersthe AWA also requires regular inspections by veterinarians, animal testing pros and cons essay. All proposals to use animals for research must be approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee IACUC set up by each research facility.
Laboratory mice, for example, live for only two to three years, so researchers can study the effects of treatments or genetic manipulation over a whole lifespan, animal testing pros and cons essay, or across several generations, which would be infeasible using human subjects.
Research animals are cared for by veterinarians, husbandry specialists, and animal health technicians to ensure their well-being and more accurate findings. Animals do not have the cognitive ability or moral judgment that humans animal testing pros and cons essay and because of this they have been treated differently animal testing pros and cons essay humans by nearly every culture throughout recorded history. If we granted animals rights, all humans would have to become vegetarians, and hunting would need to be outlawed.
American women use an average of 12 personal care products per day, so product safety is of great importance. Unlike animals used for research, humans are able to give consent to be used in testing and animal testing pros and cons essay a viable option when the need arises. One company working on a COVID vaccine, Moderna Therapeutics, worked on developing a vaccine using new technology: instead of being based on a weakened form of the virus, it was developed using a synthetic copy of the COVID genetic code.
Other research methods such as in vitro testing tests done on human cells or tissue in a petri dish offer opportunities to reduce or replace animal testing. The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings.
The s sleeping pill thalidomide, which caused 10, babies to be born with severe deformities, was tested on animals prior to its commercial release. Some chemicals that are ineffective on or harmful to animals prove valuable when used by humans. Aspirin, for example, is dangerous for some animal species.
More than one-third of women only buy cosmetics from brands that do not use animal testing. Or we can use human pigment-producing cells — melanocytes — to create a pigmented skin model that is similar to human skin from different ethnicities. Violations of the Animal Welfare Act at the federally funded New Iberia Research Center NIRC in Louisiana included maltreatment of primates who were suffering such severe psychological stress that they engaged in self-mutilation, infant primates awake and alert during painful experiments, and chimpanzees being intimidated and shot with a dart gun.
Devoting enough money and resources to animal-free alternatives could result in the same medical advances achieved through animal testing. Did You Know? The US National Institutes of Health announced it would retire its remaining 50 research chimpanzees to the Federal Chimpanzee Sanctuary System inleaving Gabon as the only country to still experiment on chimps.
A Jan. Ohio used the most guinea pigs 35,and Massachusetts used the most dogs 6, and primates 11, Researchers Joseph and Charles Vacanti grew a human "ear" seeded from implanted cow cartilage cells on the back of a living mouse to explore the possibility of fabricating body parts for plastic and reconstructive surgery.
Explore the data by state, species of animal, and types of testing. org is the institutional or organization author for all ProCon. org pages. Proper citation depends on your preferred or required style manual. Below are the proper citations for this page according to four style manuals in alphabetical order : the Modern Language Association Style Manual MLAthe Chicago Manual of Style Chicagothe Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association APAand Kate Turabian's A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, animal testing pros and cons essay, and Dissertations Turabian.
Here are the proper bibliographic citations for this page according to four style manuals in alphabetical order :. Skip to content. Animal Testing. Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing? Pro 2 Animal testing is crucial to ensure that vaccines are safe. Pro 3 There is no adequate alternative to testing on a living, whole-body system. Pro 4 Animals are appropriate research subjects because they are similar to human beings in many ways.
Pro 5 Animals must be used in cases when ethical considerations prevent the use of human subjects. Pro 6 Animals themselves benefit from the results of animal testing. Pro 7 Animal research is highly regulated, animal testing pros and cons essay, with laws in place to protect animals from mistreatment.
Pro 8 Animals often make better research subjects than human beings because of their shorter life cycles. Pro 10 Animals do not have rights, therefore it is acceptable to experiment on them. Pro 11 The vast majority of biologists and several of the largest biomedical and health organizations in the United States endorse animal testing. Pro 12 Some cosmetics and health care products must be tested on animals to ensure their safety. Con 1 Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Con 2 Scientists are able to test vaccines on humans volunteers.
Con 3 Alternative testing methods now exist that can replace the need for animals. Con 4 Animals are very different from human beings and therefore make poor test subjects. Con 5 Drugs that pass animal tests are not necessarily safe. Con 6 Animal tests may mislead researchers into ignoring potential cures and treatments.
Con 8 Animal tests do not reliably predict results in human beings. Con 9 There is increasing demand for cruelty-free products. Con 10 Most experiments involving animals are flawed, wasting the lives of the animal subjects.
Con 11 The Animal Welfare Act has not succeeded in preventing horrific cases of animal abuse in research laboratories. Con 12 Medical breakthroughs involving animal research may still have been made without the use of animals.
People who view this page may animal testing pros and cons essay like: 1. Should more gun control laws be enacted? HOME About Cite This Page Reprinting Policy Privacy Policy Disclaimer Do Not Sell My Info. Contact us. LaSalle Street, Suite Chicago, Illinois USA. Cite This Page ×. Here are the proper bibliographic citations for this page according to four style manuals in alphabetical order : APA Chicago MLA Turabian APA 6th ed.
Chicago 17th ed. org, "Animal Testing," ProCon. last modified March 18, MLA 8th ed. org, "Animal Testing. Turabian 8th ed. Last modified on March 18, Accessed May 19,
Pros and Cons of Animal Testing
, time: 1:37Animal Testing Pros and Cons Free Essay Example
Mar 18, · Animals themselves benefit from the results of animal testing. Vaccines tested on animals have saved millions of animals that would otherwise have died from rabies, distemper, feline leukemia, infectious hepatitis virus, tetanus, anthrax, and canine parvo blogger.comted Reading Time: 8 mins Aug 19, · Animal Testing Pros and Cons Introduction. The Greeks believed that animals were a lesser form of life because animals could not think like Animal testing helps in the development of drugs and treatments.. Currently, humans are often exposed to various The importance of human lives Should Animal Testing Be Banned Essay. Many animals are hurt and abused during animal testing. The animals that are tested on usually die off. Cosmetic, medical, chemical, product testing and etc. I believe all testing needs that use animals for testing needs to be banned throughout companies
No comments:
Post a Comment